WhatsApp for the testimony to be given and I’m answering that directly because I want that to be known from my point of view.
You were there.
That wasn’t the question.
You have not answered the question.
You ain’t sure.
You don’t know what you’re talking about.
And there it is everybody.
That clip will tell you everything.
Andy Bernham, the man now being pushed as Britain’s next prime minister, asked about one of the darkest scandals in our history.
And what do you get? No straight answer, no real accountability, no proper reckoning, and the same old political maneuvering we’ve seen for years.
And this matters because while the media are busy presenting Andy Burnham as the great reset, the man of the people, the savior of Labor and the new voice of hope, there’s another side to the story, a much darker side.
Because the question is not whether Andy Burnham can give a nice speech.
The question is whether he’ll confront the truth when the truth is uncomfortable.
And on the gang scandal, the question is absolutely vital.
So today we’re going to look at Andy Burnham, his vision for Britain, his sudden rise after Makerfield, and a very serious question being asked about what happened in Greater Manchester under his watch.
Burnham’s now returned to Westminster after winning the Makerfield bi-election.
He defeated reform by more than 9,000 votes and took nearly 55% of the vote share which immediately placed him at the center of the Labour leadership conversation.
ITV reported that his Makerfield win pile pressure on Kia Starmmer and the Guardian reported that Starmer’s resignation has left Burnham preparing for power.
So it’s not just another Labour politician giving a speech.
is potentially the next prime minister of the United Kingdom.
And that’s why every word, every promise, every omission and every unanswered question matters because if Burnham is going to be sold to the country as the answer, then we have to ask really what the question actually is.
Is he really the answer to Britain’s problems or is he just the next stage of the same woke managerial policies that got us into all this trouble in the first place? Now, the first source is Burnham’s Make a Field Victory Rally.
This is the big pitch.
It’s the new vision.
It’s what he wants people to believe Britain will look like under him.
The summary is that Bernham wants to end so-called trickle down economics.
He he wants to, you know, end what he calls unfair immigration systems.
He wants to push reindustrialization, use public procurement to back British business, and create workplacements for all 16 to 18 year olds.
Now, some of that sounds appealing to a lot of people.
And let’s be fair, British business should be prioritized.
British workers should be prioritized and British town should be rebuilt.
Industry should come back.
Young people should be given real skills and not just shoved into a useless degree and accompanying debt.
On the surface, part of this sounds like common sense.
But here’s the problem.
Labor politicians have been making speeches like this for decades.
They always promise fairness.
They always promise renewal.
And they always promise to rebuild forgotten towns.
They always promise to put ordinary people first.
And then what happens? Mass immigration continues.
Public services collapse.
Housing becomes unaffordable.
Crime gets worse.
Policing becomes political.
The working class get ignored.
And the people at the bottom are told to shut up and pay more tax.
So before anyone gets swept away by the speech, let’s actually listen to what Burnham is actually talking about.
So what what is that uh change? I did talk about the need to change labor in this campaign and we’ve got to now uh take this moment uh to answer uh the the challenges that have been uh laid laid down.
And I did describe it last night as a last chance to change.
And I think that’s how people here kind of saw it when I was talking to them on the doorsteps and they said, “Well, Andy, maybe we can give you our support this time, but you know, it’s not a blank check.
It’s not ongoing.
You have to respond to what people here are saying.
You have to do something to make life more affordable, to put more money in people’s pockets, to give people more breathing space again so that they can have a better life.
That’s what people were saying and we must respond uh to that.
We need an economy that works for everybody.
Not a few in far off places from here, but economy that works for people right here.
We do need to bring down water bills, energy bills, rail fairs, just as we’ve brought down bus fairs in Greater Manchester to make life more affordable for people.
We do need an end to trickle down economics, which didn’t trickle down very much at all uh to places like this.
We want to see a new drive of re-industrialization across the north of England and indeed the rest of the country and big change in Whiteall if that is to happen.
And I’m talking about public procurement.
It’s about time we started backing British business and British industry so that we can reindustrialize places like this.
And yes, let’s change the education system so that young people growing up here have clear paths into that new industry.
No more an education system dominated by the university route, but an education system that offers a path for everybody, academic and technical in equal balance.
That’s what we need if we are to to change this.
And when I say change to public procurement, as a result of uh using the power of it, get more work placements for people.
a guarantee of a work placement for every 16 to 18 year old who wants one.
The guarantee of an apprenticeship.
These are the kind of changes that we need if we are to give hope to young people growing up in this part of the world.
And yet now that’s the pitch.
That’s the sales job.
And politically you can see why Labour MPs are excited.
Burnham sounds more human than Starmer.
He sounds less robotic.
and he knows how to talk about towns, work, pride, industry, and fairness.
He understands the language of the North.
He understands how to sound like he’s on the side of working people.
But here’s a question.
Where was all this when labor was in power? And where was all this when the political class opened our borders? Where was all this when the British workers were told to comp compete with endless imported labor? And where was all this when towns were changed beyond recognition without any consent? Where was all this when the young people could couldn’t get on the housing ladder? Where was all this when police forces were more interested in tweets than street crime? Because it’s very easy to stand on the stage after a bi-election and say you’re going to fix everything.
But it’s much harder to admit who broke it in the first place.
And that’s where Burnham’s speech starts to fall apart because if you talk about an unfair immigration system, you have to explain unfair to who? Unfair to foreign nationals who want access to this country or unfair to the people who have watched their wages, housing, schools, NHS and communities placed under enormous pressure.
If you talk about rebuilding Brit, you know, the industry in this country, you have to explain how that works when the same political class has spent decades making energy expensive, regulation impossible, and loyalty to British workers almost a taboo.
And if you talk about hope, you have to explain why the people who were ignored, smeared, and silenced for years should suddenly trust you now.
But the biggest issue is this.
You can’t talk about rebuilding Britain while avoiding the scandals that destroyed trust.
And nothing’s destroyed trust more than the rape gang scandal.
Because it’s not just about crime.
It’s about institutions, councils, the police, social services, the media, and the politicians.
It’s about whether workingclass girls were treated as expendable because protecting reputations, community relations, and political narratives mattered more than protecting children did.
And this is where Rert Low’s recent comments are so important.
Because while Burnham is giving speeches about hope, Low is talking about the reality many people believe the establishment still refused to face.
Now, Rupert Low uh did a recent interview and he spoke about the gangs being allowed to flourish, workingclass communities being affected and the establishment looking the other way.
Let’s have a look at this now.
The Tories didn’t do enough about it when they were in power, but the Labor Party has put power ahead of right and wrong.
So you you’ve had and the fear of being called a racist by almost every state body has meant that they weren’t prepared to look into this in the way they should have done and and that has effectively allowed this evil to propagate.
Uh and Labor continue to refuse they refuse a national inquiry.
They’ve now said they’re having a national inquiry as a result of what we’ve done.
We’ve had 20,000 people who’ve crowdfunded a a rape gang inquiry which we’ve held.
We had twoe hearings, two of the worst weeks of my life.
We heard some absolutely horrific testimony.
And a lot of this goes back to the tensions really.
Uh a lot of it’s down to Islam and and the way in which Islam teaches its followers that they are superior to uh to to to to other religions.
And and as you know, if you ever in in, you know, during during these crusades, if you lost a battle to Saladin, you had two choices.
You either converted to Islam or they killed you.
And and it it it it’s it’s not dissimilar to that.
And we go into all the reasons, and I urge everybody to read our report.
It’s it’s it’s 200 pages of uh I think it’s fascinating.
Even though my team, my wonderful team has done it uh with the help of a superb barristister called Graham Graham Smith.
we held the hearings properly.
Um, we’ve done it uh with the backing of these 20,000 concerned people here.
So, it’s a big issue here and a lot of it has been hushed up because it’s in workingclass communities rather than the mainstream wanting it.
So, these people who call me a neo-Nazi have allowed, this is a national newspaper, have allowed this evil to continue for, as I say, 30, 40, 50 years.
on an increasing uh scale and it’s been allowed because people are frightened of being called racist.
You know, that’s the issue.
It’s like an open wound and it’s why people are furious because for years ordinary people were told they were wrong.
They were told they were exaggerating.
They were told they were being divisive and they were told just don’t notice and don’t ask difficult questions.
And really they were told about not damaging community cohesion by saying things.
And then years later after the damage was done, after lives were destroyed, after victims were ignored, and after entire towns were traumatized, the same political class turns around and says, “Lessons must be learned.
” That’s not enough, though, is it? Lessons are what you learn when you make a genuine mistake.
It wasn’t just a mistake.
It was a failure of duty, a failure of courage, a failure of institutions, and in many eyes, a failure of political will.
So when Andy Burnham is asked about these issues in Greater Manchester, people deserve a straight answer.
Not spin, not defection, not carefully managed language, a straight answer.
What did you know? When did you know it? What did you do? Who failed? Who should resign? Who should be investigated? Who should face the consequences? Because if you want to be prime minister, you know, you don’t get to dodge the hardest questions, do you? Let’s look again at Burnham’s clip.
Because this is why so many people don’t trust the political class anymore.
And I’m answering that directly because I want that to be known from my point of view.
You have not answered the question.
Ladies and gentlemen, you don’t know what you’re talking about.
You don’t know what you’re talking Now viewers can judge that for themselves, but for me that’s the problem with the new politics we’re being sold.
It’s all emotional language.
Hope, fairness, renewal, change, community, the country rebuilt.
But when it comes to the hard, ugly, uncomfortable truth, suddenly everything becomes vague.
Suddenly we get process and suddenly we get careful answers.
Suddenly we get a politician who sounds like he’s trying to push to get through the question, not answer it.
And it’s simply not good enough because this country already had enough speeches.
We’ve had enough slogans.
We’ve had enough final chances.
We’ve had enough leaders who arrive promising a new start and then delivering the same betrayal in a different accent.
So what’s the real story? Andy Burnham, you know, he’s not being presented as just another Labor MP.
He’s being presented as the reset button.
The man who can save Labor, the man who can stop reform, the man who can rebuild trust, the man who can speak to the North, and the man who can put Britain back together.
But before the country buys the image, we need some answers.
Because if Bernham wants to leave Britain, he needs to be judged not just by the promises he makes on the stage, but by the scandals he’s willing to confront when the cameras are on and the questions are uncomfortable.
And on that test, many people will look at what’s happened in Manchester, look at the scandal, look at the evasions, look at the media silence, look at the warnings from Rert Low, and they’ll just say, “No, no, we’ve seen this all before.
” It’s not change.
It’s the same system wearing a different suit because Britain doesn’t need another Polish Labor speech.
It doesn’t need another woke prime minister talking about fairness while ordinary people pay the price.
It, you know, it doesn’t need more excuses, more commissions, more coverups, more carefully worded apologies, and more elite self-p protection.
It needs truth.
It needs accountability.
It needs consequences and really it needs leaders who will protect the people of this country without fear or favor.
So when Andy Burnham stands up and says he has a vi a vision for the country, the question is very simple.
Does that vision include justice for all these girls that were failed? Does it include naming who failed them? Does it include removing people who look the other way? Does it include ending the political cowardice that allowed this to grow so big? Because if it doesn’t, that’s no vision.
It’s a sales pitch and we’ve had enough of those.
Let me know what you think in the comments.
Do you think Andy Burnham’s much cop? Do you think it’ll be more of the same? Hit the like button, subscribe to the channel, share my stuff.
I look forward to talking to you soon.
to glue.
Disclaimer : This content may be created by AI for entertainment purposes. Any resemblance to real persons, events, or places is coincidental.
