Hello.
Iran relied on two things to stand against the US Navy.
Locking the straight of Hormuz to bring the world to its knees with oil blackmail and surviving every attack with invincible missile cities buried beneath the mountains.
Now both have turned against them.
The Hormuz lock is choking Iran itself and the doors of those missile cities have been sealed from the outside.
According to Israeli intelligence, 800 missiles are trapped inside their own fortresses.
And the US did this with raw power and a brilliant tactic.
It didn’t destroy the mountains, it sealed the doors.
On May 25th to 27th, it struck Bandar Abbas, the gateway to those tunnels, repeatedly destroyed five Iranian drones in midair and leveled the ground control station.
To grasp this story, you first need to understand what Iran built in 30 years.
Keshum Island sits 22 km south of Banda Abbas in a commanding position over the straight of Hormuz.
The island’s subsurface consists of salt rock, limestone, and sedimentary rock layers, terrain that is naturally resistant to air strikes.
The IRC has been exploiting this geological advantage for over 30 years, building a massive underground network extending tens of meters below the surface.
Inside the network, there are assembly areas, storage zones, command centers, and automated rail systems connecting hidden exits.
Missile launchers are brought out of tunnels, fire, and return underground.
This cycle is called exit fire return and the entire system depends completely on the exit being functional.
The arsenal is extremely serious.
Nor and Kata 380 anti-hship missiles with 1,000 km range.
Silkworm and Gadier series ballistic warheads all waiting ready to launch.
This network is not limited to Khim.
Under the mountains of Bander Abbas, throughout Hormuzan province, there are dozens of facilities.
Together, they form Iran’s capacity to close Hormuz whenever it chooses.
The facilities are divided into three tiers by depth.
Tier three at 30 m, most vulnerable.
Tier 2 at 60 to 80 m, partially vulnerable, and tier 1 at 120 to 150 m, immune even to the most powerful bunker busters.
But the Hormuz coastal facilities including Keshum and Bandai Abbas are predominantly tier 2 and three because coastal facilities were built for speed, exit, fire, return within minutes, this design trade-off always existed and this trade-off is now costing Iran enormously.
So how do you defeat something you cannot reach from the air? The answer developed by the US and Israel is extremely clever and perhaps constitutes the least understood but most effective dimension of this conflict.
You do not destroy the bunkers.
You destroy the interface between the bunkers and the outside world.
Exits, ventilation shafts, resupply corridors, command nodes that tell missiles where to go.
Tell preparation areas just outside tunnel mouths.
You do not need to collapse the mountain.
You just need to collapse the mountain’s ability to connect with the battlefield.
And this strategy is not an operation belonging to history books.
It is actively continuing right now.
On May 25th to 26th, Sentcom struck missile launch sites on Iran’s southern coast and naval vessels attempting to lay mines in the Hormuz area.
On May 27th, four to six Iranian attack drones were destroyed in midair and the ground control station at Bander Abbas was eliminated by an air strike.
Iran’s retaliation was to launch a ballistic missile at the US base in Q8, but the missile was intercepted.
Sentcom described this as an egregious violation of the ceasefire and within hours struck Bander Abbas a second time.
The US is not only blocking tunnel exits, it is preventing Iran’s attempts to establish new launch capacity in real time.
But the foundations of this strategy were laid much earlier.
The US demonstrated this concretely on March 17th.
Sentcom confirmed it used multiple GBU72s, 5,000lb deep penetrating munitions against hardened Iranian missile zones along the Iranian coastline near the straight of Hormuz.
The GBU72 is a precision weapon specifically optimized for tunnels and bunkers with penetration capacity of up to 30 m.
It can directly strike tier 3 facilities and collapse the exit points of tier 2 facilities.
Israel’s June 2025 operations were the first major application of this strategy.
In the operation, intelligence officials called launcher hunt 293 active launchers were hit.
95 of them were buried inside collapsing tunnel openings and shafts.
According to subsequent Israeli assessment, approximately 200 launchers were destroyed while 80 more were disabled by tunnel entrance collapses.
And the figure from the Israeli national security advisers Knesset briefing reveals the scale of the situation.
Iran started the conflict with approximately 2500 ballistic missiles.
Over 500 were launched at Israel and an estimated 800 missiles may be trapped inside damaged tunnel networks.
800 missiles not destroyed, not intercepted, completely trapped within their own castles.
This single statistic reframes the entire debate because the assumption dominant in Western media had a binary structure.
Iran’s tunnels are either invincible or destroyed.
But there is a third state and militarily far more interesting.
Sealed.
And being sealed is in many ways worse than being destroyed.
Because a missile standing in a sealed tunnel with collapsed exit points, cut resupply routes, and severed command nodes is not ready for use.
It is an inaccessible inventory.
It is a deterrence that cannot be deployed.
And Iran has turned that missile city into a missile graveyard.
And the battle on May 7th, 2026 was precisely the battlefield manifestation of this sealing reality.
That day, US Navy guided missile destroyers USS Truckton, USS Raphael Peralta, and USS Mason were transiting from the Strait of Hormuz to the Gulf of Oman.
Iranian forces launched multiple missiles, drones, and fastboats without provocation.
Result: Zero damage on the American side.
Not a single ship scratched, not a single drone making contact.
Sentcom announced it eliminated incoming threats and targeted Iranian military facilities responsible for the attack, including missile launch sites, command control centers, and intelligence nodes.
Every facility hit directly corresponded to a position the IRGC had just exposed by using it.
So why did the IRGC launch this attack knowing it couldn’t win? because it was operating not from tactical confidence, but from narrowing options.
Weapons it could still reach, whose exit points were not yet fully sealed, were used in a desperate attempt to show that Iran’s naval power was still intact.
Doing nothing would have been a sign that Hormuz’s deterrence had completely collapsed.
And the command structure behind this attack makes the situation even more concerning.
IRGC Navy Commander Tang Siri, the architect of the tunnels, the commander who conducted the January 2026 propaganda tour, who declared Hormuz was fully under Iranian control.
He had been neutralized during the Israeli operation in an Israeli strike in Bander Abbas on March 26th.
Intelligence Chief Benham Resza and other senior officers also lost their lives in the same attack.
So the command structure that launched the May 7th attack, it was an architecture in which the chain of command had been severed down to three levels.
Mid-level commanders who should never have been making strategic decisions were trying to operate weapon systems whose primary exit points were partially sealed.
This resembled an institutional reflex more than a military operation.
A system that attacked not because it calculated it could win, but because it could not afford to do nothing.
And an even more striking detail, Iran had lost track of the mines it placed in its own waters and could not fully open the straight even if it wanted to.
An army that cannot account for its own minds has lost command coherence.
An army that launches a coordinated swarm attack and achieves zero damage has lost offensive capability.
This is not an army playing strategic patience at the peak of its power.
It is a controlled collapse trying to project a confidence it can no longer fully back.
And here we need to see the collapse of the IRGC’s swarm doctrine.
It spent 30 years developing.
Small boats, low radar profile, rapid approach.
The theory was that this saturation would overwhelm the Aegis systems tracking and engagement capacity.
On May 7th, this theory was tested in real combat and produced zero damage.
US forces deployed a H64 Apache and MH60 Seah Hawk platforms as anti-warm tools, completely eliminating the IRGC’s asymmetric advantage.
The gap between a threat emerging and responding to it, the foundation of the IRGC’s entire swarm doctrine was closed by the Apache’s continuous air presence.
Trump’s words summarize this new reality.
American forces destroyed the attackers.
If Iran doesn’t sign a deal soon, we will topple them much harder and more violently.
This is not the language of a power viewing its enemy as a serious threat.
It is the language of a power that has concluded the conflict has decisively turned in its favor.
But we need to be fair here.
The IRGC is not completely helpless.
An organization that spent 30 years building these tunnels has also developed serious countermeasures to protect them.
At the structural level, tunnels were built with extensive redundancy.
Multiple exits, fake entrances, internal compartments, and traps designed to absorb attacks are present.
At Keshum, natural geology provides additional advantage to this redundancy.
Salt rock formations offer natural cave networks, and combining them with artificial tunnels creates alternative exit points.
At the operational level, the IRGC has deployed rapid repair teams.
Debris removal and tunnel opening work is visible in satellite imagery.
Deception tactics are also in play.
Decoy launches, fake tunnel entrances, and predistributing some missile stocks outside.
The aim is to mislead US satellite monitoring and create uncertainty about which struck exits are real and which are fake.
At the technological level, the IRGC even announced underwater missile tunnels in early 2026, submarine launch capacity.
Whether these systems are operational has not been confirmed, but the concept aims to completely bypass the exit point.
Electronic warfare capacity is also in play.
Air defense and drone/satellite jamming systems are being placed around entrances.
And as of May 2026, according to US intelligence assessment, Iran has restored access to 30 of 33 Hormuz sites and still holds 70% of its stock.
So it was not completely sealed.
The IRGC has reopened some exits.
But here there is a critical distinction.
Restoring access and returning to full operational capacity are very different things.
Clearing a tunnel entrance of debris can take days, but rebuilding damaged command infrastructure, placing experienced leaders to replace killed commanders, and reprogramming coordinated launch sequences takes much longer.
And the biggest handicap is this.
The US has air superiority.
These repair operations are being done under open skies and every repair is monitored by US satellites.
When you open an exit, you have told the US this is an active target.
This traps the IRGC in a vicious cycle.
If you don’t open the exit, you cannot use the missile.
If you open it, you get hit.
And the economic crisis makes this equation even more difficult.
Tunnel repair is expensive.
It requires engineering teams, heavy equipment, concrete and steel.
The regime’s oil revenues are zero.
The budget has collapsed and the IRGC cannot even pay its own soldiers salaries.
Under these conditions, covering the cost of repairing tunnel infrastructure becomes increasingly difficult and the regime faces a very painful prioritization decision.
Will you repair tunnel exits, provide subsidies to a population struggling with 60% inflation, or increase security spending to suppress the internal uprising in which the civil uprising that resulted in more than 30,000 civilian casualties? A regime that massacres its own people, simultaneously tries to repair collapsing tunnel exits, negotiates a ceasefire through Pakistani mediators, and tries to project military credibility against three carrier strike groups is operating at the absolute limit of its institutional capacity.
And the tunnel network problem is not just military, it is financial.
This is a prioritization problem.
And every day those exits remain sealed is a day Iran cannot repair the infrastructure that made its deterrence credible in the first place.
Now let’s look at the big picture because the tunnel crisis is not just a military problem.
This is a strategic transformation that directly affects Iran’s entire negotiating power, regional influence and regime security.
Iran started this conflict with 2500 ballistic missiles.
Over 500 were launched at Israel.
800 are trapped in tunnels.
Hundreds were destroyed in surface strikes.
The remaining infantry is rapidly shrinking.
And every missile used can no longer be replaced because the Hormuz blockade has also cut weapons imports.
In ceasefire talks under Pakistani mediation, Iran’s card at the table rested entirely on the existence of these weapons.
The will close Hormuz threat was a valuable card in negotiations because 20 million barrels of oil passed through that straight every day.
But when US intelligence, British GCHQ, and Israeli signals intelligence systematically mapped and struck tunnel exit architecture for 10 weeks, Iran’s negotiating power was quietly hollowed out.
And the world economy is hostage to this uncertainty.
Brent crude soared above $126.
Ship passages through the strait dropped to 5% of pre-conlict levels.
2,000 ships are stranded in the Persian Gulf.
In the words of VTOL CEO Russell Hardy, 1 billion barrels of oil production will be lost due to the war and 6 to 700 million barrels of loss has already accumulated.
The global economy is being held hostage not by an arsenal that can freely fire, but by uncertainty about how much of that arsenal can still fire.
And this uncertainty itself is a form of leverage.
Perhaps the only form Iran has left.
The naval blockade also triggered a simultaneous food supply emergency in GCC countries dependent on the strait for over 80% of their caloric needs.
By mid-March, 70% of the region’s food imports had been disrupted.
This is no longer abstract geopolitics.
It is families in Kuwait, Qatar, and Bahrain paying emergency prices for basic food, American drivers facing gasoline prices not seen in years, and global aviation burning extra fuel circling around closed airspace.
Secretary of State Rubio spoke very clearly.
We cannot tolerate a system where tan decides who uses an international waterway.
This defines the American red line in definitive terms.
And the military tool enforcing this red line, three carrier strike groups, F-35C’s, Eegis destroyers, Apache helicopters, bunker busting munitions are all deployed and operational.
Iran’s question to answer now is not whether its tunnels survived.
They did.
The mountains are solid.
The weapons are solid.
The real question is whether surviving without access is the same thing as deterrence.
Iran built its missile cities to be impenetrable.
And in a way they s weapons inside a solid.
But the US did not destroy the mountains.
It sealed the doors.
It collapsed the exits, blocked the ventilation, severed the command chain, and cut the resupply corridors.
And a fortress whose doors are sealed from the outside is no longer a bastion.
It is a safe.
A safe full of weapons no one can reach is not a military asset.
It is a monument to a 30-year doctrine.
The IRGC developed counter measures, rapid repair, fake exits, underwater tunnels.
It restored access to 30 of 33 sites.
But as long as air supremacy belongs to the US, every opened exit is a new target.
and economic collapse erodess the repair budget a little more each day.
The exit, fire, return cycle was Iran’s 30-year military philosophy.
Now, the first step of that cycle, exit, is largely blocked, and a missile city without an exit is not a castle.
It is a cage.
The May 7th battle showed this to the entire world.
The IRGC attacked and achieved zero damage.
It launched a coordinated swarm attack and could not scratch a single ship.
And that attack was more a confession of desperation than a show of strength.
If the silence from the mountain exits continues, the world will have received its answer.
And that silence grows a little deeper each day.
So, what do you think about this topic? Share your thoughts in the comments.
To stay updated on PPR Global’s analysis, don’t forget to subscribe to the channel and turn on notifications.
Thank you for choosing us.
We’ve reached the end of our video, but our analysis doesn’t stop here.
If you’d like to listen to these in-depth reports from PPR Global, which cover global developments with the ease of a podcast during your long car rides or daily breaks, we invite you to visit our Spotify channel.
Follow our Spotify account right now via the link in the description section and never miss out on what’s happening in the world, no matter where you are or what the circumstances.
