And hello everybody.
Welcome back to the channel.
Guys, the fallout continues and these Labour politicians think the British public are genuinely stupid.
Yes, the interaction that you’re about to hit to see today suggests that entirely.
Now, a lot of the topic of discussion is coming in the fallout of Henry Novak’s murder CCTV footage being released.
Yesterday in PMQs, we see Nigel Farage booed by Labour MPs for coming out and saying that there’s two-tier policing in this country.
Now, we’ve got this Labour MP who sits who’s asked in this Sky News interview if there is two-tier policing.
And again, as I said, I think she thinks the British public are stupid, or at least I think she might be stupid because she says that there is no two-tier policing, but then goes on to say that we need to look at the guidelines for the police where it clearly says to treat different ethnic groups on a different basis.
Truly insane.
And I’ll go even further on that point.
By the way, it’s not just the police.
It’s most public services.
And the British public have had enough of it.
Let’s have a watch of this, guys.
But first, please do hit the like button and hit the subscribe button for more.
Do you think we have two-tier policing in the UK? No.
And why is that? Well, because I mean really fundamentally, I think that is a slur on the thousands of police officers that go out to work every day putting themselves in harm’s way to serve the public, to try and prevent crime, and to keep us all safe.
So I think that the suggestion in light of that that we have two-tier policing which suggests at its heart that the police are on a sort of systemic basis pushing the interests of one group above another I genuinely think is a is a slur on all those um police officers that are serving this country day and night seven days a week.
Is there an argument that the framework that the police are operating in has created an unequal system? I’m thinking about, for example, the MPCC guidance that says not everyone should be treated equally.
The Times and Telegraph reporting today that police officers in Hampshire felt pressured by mandatory diversity training, one in seven felt controlled or pressured to feel certain ways.
I think um you know and to be so I should have started by saying actually in relation to Henry Novak I don’t you you will have seen the footage in the same way that I have of the last moments of his life and I think that’s just I mean entirely harrowing and just so tragic and I you know felt utterly uh devastated and I think you know the right the prime minister is responding to that in in exactly the right way by suggesting that there are these these really serious questions to answer and that process has begun.
That that leads me to the to the guidance that you referred to, the NPCC um guidance, and there’s also the IOPC investigation as well, which which is going on.
Look, I think it’s it’s the right thing to do um that that guidance is is looked at because the fundamental principle, as you know, that we have uh in this country is equality before the law.
that is, you know, a fundamental British value up there with respect and uh tolerance and fairness and and democracy and everything else that um you know, makes me proud to be British and frankly makes this country uh great.
But equality before the law is the key.
And so I think once you’ve set that as the bedrock, everything needs to everything needs to stem from that.
And do you think I guess do you agree with the argument that some have been making that there isn’t equality before the law because of some of this diversity framework that different groups should be treated differently? I think so.
I think I’m right in saying that ministers in the home office have said in relation to that the piece of guidance that you’re referring to the MPCC guidance that there may well be a section of it where the wording is um clumsy I think I think they’ve said and needs to be which Sarah’s wrong they go so um that will be that will be looked at but as I said I think in relation to that piece of guidance but also much more broadly and right across the piece in every single area of uh of government and indeed our wider society the fundamental al principle is equality before the law.
Honestly, what a load of absolute tripe there.
I mean, she just the question she says, “Oh, is there such thing as two-tier policing?” She goes, “No.
” But again, here’s just a little segment here from this racial equality act or whatever it’s called that they’ve got.
Our commitment to racial equity uh means producing equality of policing outcomes for people from different economic groups by responding to individual and communities according to their specific needs, circumstances, and experiences with understanding that these will be radicalized and with the aim of reducing harm.
And as you can see, as we’ve underlined here, it does not mean treating everybody the same or being colorblind racial equality.
So, I’m literally reading something from their actual form that they’re trying to suggest that there is no such thing.
Truly insane that they’re trying to gaslight.
On the other side of the political spectrum, though, with um conservatives, Cla Catinia um is right.
Do you think we do? Yes, I do think it’s a huge problem.
There’s a race action plan at the moment which says that the police should treat ethnic minorities differently.
That is clearly wrong.
It’s something we’ve been campaigning against, but it’s not just within the police.
It’s across our public services.
There has been an ideology that has taken hold which says that racism is the worst thing that can happen.
But it’s not the worst thing.
You’ve seen uh you know cases of murder, cases of child abuse, uh cases where uh the people who are meant to protect us from harm have not been able to do that job because they have been frightened of being called racist.
So we have to root out that ideology and we have to let our public services do what is often a very hard job which is protect the public from harm.
What what are these sort of specific examples that you give on that? And so you have the case of the Southport killer where a head teacher said, “I think something’s going on here.
” And someone said, “Well, actually, I think it might be racist to identify this young black man as someone who’s being associated with knife crime, even though he was.
” You had the case of the Nottingham killer where a a person with a history of violence was not institutionalized.
Why? Because the mental health services were frightened of being called racist.
You had the Manchester bomber where the security guard said, “I felt like something was wrong, but I did not raise the alarm because I was scared of being called racist.
” You had the case of Sarah Sharif, a young girl in Surrey who died.
And why? Because again, the social services could spot something was wrong.
She was being forced to wear a hijab to cover her injuries.
And they did not want to raise the alarm because they were frightened of being called racist.
So yes, there are number a number of these cases now.
And it all comes back to this point.
We are telling these public services to prioritize being seen to be anti-racist over doing their job.
It is clouding their judgment is making their job harder.
So just to be really because this is so important, right? What exactly do you want to see happen? Are you calling for a changing in the guidance to show that everyone is treated equally under the law or are you saying that actually any diversity training should not be happening? So there’s there’s all of these things.
So we have campaigned against that race action plan.
We think it is wrong.
You should not treat ethnic minorities differently.
everyone should be treated the same when it comes to the law.
You also need to reform the Equality Act, something we’ve been talking about, because again, there are parts of that which tell public services to treat people differently.
You also have to get rid of the Islamophobia definition that Labour have just brought in that I have campaigned against because again, it is teaching public services to treat Muslims differently.
Everybody should be treated the same when it comes to the law, when it comes to penalty, when it comes to privilege.
See, there you go.
I mean, two sides there.
Conservatives, Labor.
Everybody else can see that there is a two-tier policing.
There’s a problem with our policing and public services.
However, the Labor Party don’t, right? And this is this is the this is honestly so frustrating.
And uh yeah, this is just going to continue to to happen in our country because they don’t take it seriously.
Hence why people going out protesting.
Let me know your thoughts on that down there in the comments.
